Talk:Balkhab uprising

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Afghanistan Low‑importance

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New page

It's gonna be a long article with how much is happening these past few days Kelhuri (talk) 19:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be severely changed. It's filled with inaccuracies, most of them stemming from the fact that opposition papers such as Hasht-e Subh are the sources. Hasht-e Subh has reportedly made fake claims since the Taliban captured Afghanistan, most of them exaggerating or introducing ethnic elements into stories. For example, there is no independent proof that Salahuddin Ayubi, the Uzbek Taliban commander, refused to provide fighters - in fact he was a minister at the time, no longer a commander (see here: https://pajhwok.com/ps/2022/03/04/%d9%be%d9%87-%db%8c%d9%88-%d8%b4%d9%85%db%8c%d8%b1-%d9%88%d8%b2%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%aa%d9%88%d9%86%d9%88%d8%8c-%d9%82%d9%88%d9%84-%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%af%d9%88-%da%ab%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88-%d8%a7%d9%88-%d9%88%d9%84/). Similarly, the numbers around here was wildly disputable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.228.68.250 (talk) 02:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I pointed out some other examples of the source's unreliability on the reliable sources noticeboard previously. This article certainly relies far too heavily on them. Samiollah1357 (talk) 18:49, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]