Talk:Babu Chotelal Shrivastava

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

India: History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start.

The "external links" would make good references.

The term "Jungle" in "Jungle Satyagraha" is confusing. While Satyagraha is mentioned a lot in the references, I can't see where "jungle" is. Possibly a translation error?

North8000 (talk) 13:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view?

Hello! It appears that this page is not neutral, as it calls the British Raj "tyrannical". Albeit the Raj did lots of bad to India in my opinion, Wikipedia is based on a neutral point of view and thus needs to talk about the Raj in a way that does not show the Raj in a negative or positive light, rather a neutral light. In order to do this, you can say something like "Babu protested against the British Raj because he did not agree with what they were doing to people." Thank you! Capsulecap (talk) 15:03, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Naming

Wikipedia very, very heavily discourages the use of titles of any kind, with very rare exceptions. I am thinking that the subject should be called Shrivastava except in mentions that need a full name. Some of the name uses in here either refer to him in ways that I am not understanding, or seem to be bordering on references to other people that border on coatracking.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]