Talk:Bajiquan

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bajiquan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Martial arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japanese names for Chinese styles

Apparently a lot of people have got these mixed up (and thus should not be entering them themselves in the articles), but here they are:

Baguazhang = Hakkeshou Piguaquan = Hikaken Bajiquan = Hakkyokuken

I have fixed the mistakes that were there already, but hopefully we can avoid any more...

Edededed 01:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguiity/misinformation

This article needs major revision if it's to provide a clear picture of Baji. Right now, it's far too unfocused. For instance, it claims "there are more than 20 different forms..." What branch it it talking about? The lineage from Liu Yun Chiao only has 3 or 4 (depending on what you count as a "form"). Other Brnaches have 8, others 10. This needs clarification. Also comments about the nature of the stances ("higher than longfist"?) are misleading at best (uninformed at worst). Like I said, lots of reworking would help this article, which DOES contain a lot of great information. Too ambiguous, not enough clariffication.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.173.151.4 (talk • contribs)

Jingang Bashi

The Jingang Liu He Ba Shi (Buddha guardian's Six Harmonies Eight Posture) are a jibengong practice that several Baji lineages adopted from the art of Jingang Bashi. They were not a "Baji influence on Jingang", as was previously written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan.bluestein (talk • contribs) 10:39, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 November 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 11:10, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bājíquán → Bajiquan – No tone marks in title. Timmyshin (talk) 03:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - this should be an uncontroversial move per WP:Chinese. -Zanhe (talk) 21:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bajiquan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090101183124/http://www.wsbjq.com:80/ecele2.asp to http://www.wsbjq.com/ecele2.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 July 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved/Withdrawn by proposer (closed by non-admin page mover) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bajiquan → Baji quan – Both to be WP:CONSISTENT with other forms of Chinese boxing (e.g. xingyi quan) and to follow the WP:NCZH policy to space pinyin according to words. SilverStar54 (talk) 21:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Please see my discussion of the same issue at Talk:Yiquan#Requested_move_17_July_2023. Jōkepedia (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, my mistake. I withdraw this proposed move. SilverStar54 (talk) 03:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.