Jump to content

Talk:Ayesha Jalal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Towards an NPOV on the Columbia controversy

Untitled

[edit]

I have removed some lines from the section on Jalal's denial of tenure at Columbia, and inserted some additional context. The suggestion that her accusations were "unsupported by other Pakistani or Muslim faculty" is unsubstantiated. If someone wants to put this back in, it is necessary to add a reference. I have left one of the alleged quotes from the legal decision, but a reference should be added there also. The second quotation seems especially suspect to me, for I doubt a court would dismiss a discrimination claim on the basis of "oddness". The last line of that section on the frivolity of Jalal's claim displays clear bias and I have eliminated it. It is indeed true that the vast bulk of discrimination claims are dismissed by courts. In a case such as tenure, in which the university is able to exclude closed-door proceedings, the prosecution essentially needs to get someone to admit to discrimination on the stand. To say these cases are frivolous in the first place is sheer mischief.

Finally, I have added some context regarding Jalal's opposition to accepting the donation for what eventually became the Dharam Hinduja Institute of Indic Research, which lived a short and controversial existence at Columbia. Many have alleged that this move on her part was the reason she was denied tenure. I am not so bold as to suggest this in the entry, but it certainly bears mention and I think none would deny that she did in fact oppose accepting the funding. -elbev

It seems odd to me that a woman who has a background that many Pakistanis would be suspicious of, given she is married to a non-Muslim and a Hindu at that) would be seen as pro-Pakistani or even as pro-Muslim (her marital status alone renders her a non-Muslim according all schools of Islamic jurisprudence) by Hindu faculty. In fact they would be glad her teaching on Indian topics and use her as a propaganda too. This is done quite regularly in other arenas e.g. Bollywood etc. Maybe being denied tenure at Columbia was political but not ethnicity based.((User:Moarrikh)) 01:47, 11th December 2011. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.126.222.26 (talk) 01:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ayesha Jalal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]