Talk:Aviators Code Initiative

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aviators Code Initiative article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Transport

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edit-related discussion

Returning to the NPOV-ification project (see below), I felt that as written, the article had some structural issues. So I re-contextualized and rewrote it. In the process, I've removed a bunch of detail that I found marginally useful. The reader interested in such detail may click through to the code's home page. Sanjaysaigal (talk) 23:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vegaswikian recently swapped the Flying category tag with Flight Training. While appreciating that the latter tag loosely applies, why remove Flying? After all, it's the Aviators code, not the Student Pilot's code :) I suggest either reverting or using both categories. Sanjaysaigal (talk) 03:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

This is an explanation why there is a notability tag on this article. The objective of the main author of this article appears to be mainly aimed at publicizing his/her venture rather than at improving Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promoting new publications, however worthy. Even if the venture is completely altruistic, the article fails the criterion of Wikipedia:Notability because "The number of sources provide the most objective evidence of notability. The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources." "The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it."

The fact that the code exists does not mean that it automatically merits inclusion in Wikipedia. On similar grounds you could have an article for every book, magazine and manual that was ever published. The article has therefore been tagged for 'notability'. JMcC 08:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For a discussion about this, see User talk:Jmcc150 and User talk:Michaelsbaum JMcC 18:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I'm not stepping on Wikipedia Establishment toes by removing the orphan and notability flags. The AMCC, while not the biggest thing in general aviation, is well-regarded in the GA community. For this pilot and long-time AOPA and COPA member, it certainly passes the notability bar. (The article itself appears to need NPOV-ification, some of which I've attempted. More to come.) Sanjaysaigal 22:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded the Overview with numerous third party sources that reveal how well regarded the AMCC is in general aviation and in how many sectors it has been adopted and is being promoted. I would argue that the Notability issue is resolved and this flag should be removed. Rstowell (talk) 14:53, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is not currently tagged for notability. - Ahunt (talk) 15:25, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the additions and edits I've now done on the Overview, Permanent Editorial Board, and Structure sections addresses the concern about the major contributor being closely connected to the subject. Rstowell (talk) 17:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think your additions here justify removing both tags, so I have removed them. - Ahunt (talk) 17:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Avaitor predictor

To have codes of aviator predictor 105.4.1.177 (talk) 09:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Salut comment allez vous svp le code daviator predictor 105.235.71.52 (talk) 23:26, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need code aviator Predator 102.89.68.140 (talk) 10:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]