Talk:Self-driving car liability

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 11 January 2017 by reviewer Gab4gab (talk · contribs).

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Robotics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law C‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sartuni, Alvcantu.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yl1665, Ywqz228.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some proposed changes

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

1. Article mixes a general description of the issues with what appears to be a solely US-centric view of the legal issues. Suggest that these are explicitly separated into different sections. 2. Terminiology - There is mention of the liability of the "programmer". I assume that this actually refers to the designer of the system, as opposed to a person who implemented someone else's design (which is what I regard as the normal meaning of the term). Suggest that precise definitions are added to clarify. Barney8000 (talk) 08:53, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply quotebox with inserted reviewer decisions and feedback 26-MAR-2018

Below you will see where text from your request has been quoted with individual advisory messages placed underneath, either accepting, declining or otherwise commenting upon your proposal(s). Please see the enclosed notes for additional information about each request. Spintendo 21:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article mixes a general description of the issues with what appears to be a solely US-centric view of the legal issues. Suggest that these are explicitly separated into different sections.
Approved.^{[note 1]}
___________

Terminiology - There is mention of the liability of the "programmer". I assume that this actually refers to the designer of the system, as opposed to a person who implemented someone else's design (which is what I regard as the normal meaning of the term). Suggest that precise definitions are added to clarify.
Approved.^{[note 2]}
___________

^ To specify which country these policy considerations were relevant for, "US" was placed in the subheading's title.

^ "Programmer" is the nomenclature used by University of Brighton researcher John Kingston, the person whose legal theories are discussed and cited from in this passage. The qualification "software designer" was added to the first instance of programmer in order to clarify for the reader what this meant.

Non deprecated source needed: users-in-charge

To lead the way of the regulation, the UK proposed to name users-in-charge the driver of a self-driving car. In such a case, the driver would not be criminally liable for some specific offenses, while the user in charge will still need to be qualified and fit to drive^[1]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.67.202.121 (talk) 18:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be frank, one other source do exist, so you could include your text with this better source:

https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/law-commissions-analysis-of-responses-to-automated-vehicle-consultation-points-to-the-way-forward/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.67.202.121 (talk) 18:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The user-in-charge and no user in charge (NUIC) also appears in fleetnews ("the blame game") in https://cdn.fleetnews.co.uk/web/1/digital-issue-categories/march-2021/FN_Mar_2021_mag/index.html#page=17 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.136.215.10 (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9065865/Self-driving-car-owners-NOT-face-crash-blame-accidents-experts-say.html

Current liability frameworks

"Current liability frameworks — Existing tort liability for drivers and insurers and product liability for manufacturer"

This looks like it means "now" while this "now" word should not used on wikipedia!

If liability frameworks can change with regulation changes, is this still current and existing?

Also, is this section specific to the US or a specific geographical area?

Or is this section a description for a need of regulation? 77.193.104.36 (talk) 10:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] To specify which country these policy considerations were relevant for, "US" was placed in the subheading's title.

[2] "Programmer" is the nomenclature used by University of Brighton researcher John Kingston, the person whose legal theories are discussed and cited from in this passage. The qualification "software designer" was added to the first instance of programmer in order to clarify for the reader what this meant.

[3] ttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9065865/Self-driving-car-owners-NOT-face-crash-blame-accidents-experts-say.html

[note 1]

[note 2]

[1]