Talk:Glossary of automotive design
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 18 February 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Scope
[edit]Do things like "truck" really belong here? Category:Car body styles is somewhat large... add in Category:Auto parts and Category:Automotive technologies (and all the perma-stub dicdefs that have been deleted or haven't been entered yet), and this page will be really really large. --Interiot 15:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Aha, since Car body style already exists, no, truck doesn't belong here. --Interiot 12:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- How about surface form descriptions that relate to computer modeling or metal crafting?
- I'm wondering if this would be the best place to download what I've accumulated for car styling form descriptions. --Stephanpark 23:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Needs some implementation of redirect. Also there's been some information degradation.
[edit]The topic and terminology needs an appropriate redirect. There also appears to be some degree of loss or degradation of available information with some changes. (Trucks are related to cars as civil passenger vehicles, and design implementation and theory crosses over. It is doubtful Detroit, California, Milan, make them that exclusive in applied practices and design theory.) Is there a way to provide a clear index method/glossary summation of all such related terms? Sometimes it's good to find everything in one spot with comprehensive cross reference, and I don't believe a dictonary does that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.194.160.54 (talk) 07:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC).
2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message
[edit] | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |