Jump to content

Talk:Geography of Australian rules football

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title

[edit]

Souldn't this be Australian rules football around the world.

  • this title is misleading.

I agree. If there's no complaints, we can move it? Internal wiki links will still redirect here.

I believe you should take a look at Portal:Australian rules football and considering adding the information on International aussie rules to its relevant section. Rogerthat Talk 03:52, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opening para

[edit]

The opening para currently says: "Most of these competitions no longer exist and the game is played in Australia only, however, the largest overseas competition is the Ontario Australian Football League, with 12 teams scheduled to compete in 2006. Separate from their local competitions, North American fans have formed an organization..." Is it true to say most no longer exist? I would have thought that most of the ones cited do in fact continue to exist. ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 04:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World Ranks

[edit]

How can a team be ranked number 1 in a comp. that it does not even play in? There is no doubt Australia would be number 1 but they dont even play in that comp. It makes no sence having them in that list. Tiger Woods would be the best player in the Victorian Golf Ranks. Hes not there because he does not compete for these ranks. It should be the same case here. We need to get rid of australia in the rankings. --220.237.166.156 12:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More on world rankings. The numbers seem to be pulled out of thin air; if you sum the total number of matches won, there are 113. But if you sum the number of matches lost, there are only 73. Surely the sum of the matches won should be equal to the sum of the matches lost.

"Unofficial Women's International Rankings"

[edit]

I'm pasting this here until someone finishes or maintains it. Ta, SeventhHell (talk) 13:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unofficial Women's International Rankings

[edit]
Ranking Country #Played #Won %Won #Lost %Lost #Drawn %Drawn
1 Australia Australia 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
2 United States United States of America 2 2 100% 0 0% 0 0%
3 Canada Canada 2 0 0% 2 100% 0 0%
4 Papua New Guinea Papua New Guinea 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
5 Japan Japan 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
6 New Zealand New Zealand 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
7 England England 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
8 South Africa South Africa 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
9 Argentina Argentina 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geography of Australian rules football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geography of Australian rules football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Geography of Australian rules football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]