Talk:Austin Armoured Car

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Effectiveness?

The article contains a service history, but nothing on the actual effectiveness of the vehicle in combat. Did it see action in WW1 or the Russian Civil War? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 17:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 October 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Austin Armoured Car be renamed and moved to Austin armoured car.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Austin Armoured Car → Austin armoured car – Like most other armoured cars, not a proper name. Dicklyon (talk) 04:56, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, per MOS and nom. The redirect for the article has to be changed, as well. Kierzek (talk) 13:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. The article describes an entire series of armoured cars, none of which are formally designated as the "Austin Armoured Car". Carguychris (talk) 14:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy support – super obvious, e.g. per User:Dicklyon/MIL precedents, which explicitly includes at least five prior similar armoured car articles. We just did Humber armoured car a few days ago. While we're at it, let's fix Minerva Armored Car (spelled without a 'u'), AEC Armoured Car, Daimler Armoured Car, Ford Mk V Armoured Car, Fox Armoured Car, Garford-Putilov Armoured Car, Leyland Armoured Car, Rover Light Armoured Car, Rhino Heavy Armoured Car, and Vespa-Caproni Armoured Car. Something (somewhat different) should also be done with Armoured Carrier Wheeled Indian Pattern. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]