Talk:Aure soavi e lieti (Handel)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Aure soavi e lieti was copied or moved into Aure soavi e lieti (Handel) with this edit on 1 December 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ShannaGabrielle.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent over-write

Please do not overwrite previous versions of an article unless it is an improvement. I have restored the Movement table which had been replaced by poorly laid out and incomplete material copied from the now re-directed Aure soavi e lieti. The overwrite had also removed valuable and referenced information from the previous version of this article concerning the catalog numbers and date of composition and the Handel navigation template. I have restored all of this. I have also rewritten the recently added "Handel in Italy 1702-1709" and "Handel and the Rospoli Family" [sic] sections as a single section "Background". Note that the two former sections were inaccurate, confusing, unreferenced, and full of mispellings. Finally, do not add headers for empty sections. Wait until you have written the section, and please ensure that any new sections are strictly relevant to this composition and not simply padding. I have removed the added inappropriate "Terminology" section. Terminology on Wikipedia is handled by internal links to the articles that define the terms. If there is no article defining the term, then define it in the article text at the point where it is used. Voceditenore (talk) 14:57, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]