Talk:August Jam
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the August Jam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on August Jam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929104456/http://www.metrotimes.com/editorial/review.asp?id=79767 to http://www.metrotimes.com/editorial/review.asp?id=79767
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
==Controversies==
On talking due to lack of published & there for citable accounts of many of the dirty dealing, in addition whistle blowers would be blackballed if they dared to report rampant violations .....
There were problems getting performers and backstage crew to the stage due to the crowds,traffic and location. The promoter to solve this used a helicopter to get artists and crew in and took artists back on trips to pick up the next artists. However on the end of the night and of the event the promoter did not pick up the crew on the helicopter(or provide other transportation) to take them back to where they parked several miles from the venue. Stranding the local crew production staff late at night at a temporary show venue , that did not adequate food water and/or shelter facilities. Those crew then had to to work there way through the ground then walk several miles longer than the helicopter flight(flight paths are more straight/direct verses the rural roads going around private property), to get back to their vehicles to drive home. Sadly sources are interviews and conversations with fellow stagehands that worked the show andlessions that local stage union learned about including terms in contracts and not trusting promoters to do the right thing by the people that bailed them out. ---ref history of I.A.T.S.E. local 322 Charlotte NC.208.104.49.22 (talk) 20:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Start-Class Festivals articles
- Low-importance Festivals articles
- WikiProject Festivals articles
- Start-Class Progressive rock articles
- Low-importance Progressive rock articles
- Start-Class Rock music articles
- Low-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class North Carolina articles
- Low-importance North Carolina articles
- WikiProject North Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles