Talk:Atlantic hurricane/GA1

GA Review

Prelimenary

Hello! I am just about to begin a review of this page for Good Article status. Any questions can be posted on my talk page, if you need me - Weebiloobil (talk) 08:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

The article is in good shape; only the odd slip-up.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Very well done - only the odd typo in the lead, which I fixed myself

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   My only complaint is reference 3 - it leads to a collection of images and groups, not specifying the job of the United States National Hurricane Centre

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Although there was an excessive amount of edits in the 10 June

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   To improve the article, the actual name of the pics can be sorted out, but this is not a reason for failure

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Congratulations - a very good article

If you wish to begin assessing articles yourself, feel free to head over to WP:GAN