Talk:Astraeus hygrometricus

Astraeus hygrometricus is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 24, 2017.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 9, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
September 27, 2011	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 2, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the false earthstar in the fungal family Astraeaceae (pictured) can open and close its rays in response to changes in humidity?

Current status: Featured article

Fungi Mid‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Astraeus hygrometricus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA and I have just one question before I complete the review. Given that there is a possible confusion between North American and Asian versions, is this only relevant to the "Edibility" section? And should this be mentioned in the lede? —Mattisse (Talk) 22:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good point. I had written the parent taxon article Astraeus simultaneously, and included this info in that article but neglected to mention it in this one. Have now added another paragraph to the Taxonomy section, and mentioned in the lede. Sasata (talk) 23:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows MoS
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): Covers major areas b (focused): Remains focused on topic
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: Neutral
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: Stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass!

Congratulations!

—Mattisse (Talk) 00:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Astraeus hygrometricus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331115054/http://www.chalcogen.infim.ro/637_Biswas.pdf to http://www.chalcogen.infim.ro/637_Biswas.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]