Talk:Assyriska FF

Assyria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: Sweden Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Swedish football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

untitled

I disagree with this edit and comment. "Youth tournaments are not notable enough to be included" [1]?
This is not some local inimportant tournament. That's world club championship (under 11).
This is big achievement of this club.
If we continue to delete such sections, we'll end in deleting the article about FIFA's and UEFA's championships U21, U17 etc... Kamarad Walter (talk) 12:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can't seriously compare a youth club tournament (no, the Gothia Cup is not a world club championship, although it is the largest youth tournament in the world) win for eleven year olds, with the World Championships for U-17 national teams. Check any other club article on Wikipedia, for example the ones that are featured articles, listed here, and you'll notice that none of them includes U-11 tournament wins. For example, the article IFK Göteborg does not include that club's three wins in Gothia Cup, the latest in 2006 in the U-16 class. And either way, the article, as all other football club articles, is about the senior team, not about the youth teams (which are not notable enough for Wikipedia). – Elisson • T • C • 12:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a clear answer for this, but I think you guys should take it to WikiProject Football and see what they say. Chaldean (talk) 17:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is pretty clear by just looking at the honours/achievements sections of all the club articles WP:WPF have promoted to featured status, that under-11 victories, or any youth team victories whatsoever are not generally notable enough to be included. – Elisson • T • C • 22:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Former players"-section

I don't think it's a good section at all. Why should we have a section listing all former players? Shmayo (talk) 17:54, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. A better idea would be to rename the section "Notable players" and decide on a certain criteria like players who have played a certain amount of matches for the club, 100, 200, 500 and etc. However, the common thing to do is to create seperate lists for players with at least 100 matches played for the club, see List of Malmö FF players for example, and leave a smaller list with tighter criteria on the main article. The list in it's current form exists without criteria and listing all former players would be overkill to feature on the main article of the club, that's more fitting for a category, see Category:Assyriska Föreningen players. --Reckless182 (talk) 18:10, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a new section for nobable players instead could be good. I'm not sure if creating a new article is nessercery, Malmö FF is a much older club, not sure if there are many in Assyriska's history that've played more than 100 matches. Shmayo (talk) 17:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo

Why did they remove Assyriskas logo? --Suryoye85 (talk) 14:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as unopposed. Number 5 7 21:50, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assyriska Föreningen → Assyriska FF – The official name of the club is Assyriska FF, not Assyriska Föreningen. Gryf (talk) 19:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Assyriska FF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]