Talk:Kypuche

On 20 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Artemivsk, Luhansk Oblast to Kypuche. The result of the discussion was moved.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kirovske, Donetsk Oblast which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:32, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 November 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 19:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Artemivsk, Luhansk Oblast → Kypuche – There aren't any sources that still call it Artemivsk. In raw Google Web Search, it seems that Kypuche (46,700) is used more commonly than Artemivsk (700-1700), and pretty much all of the Artemivsk sources are referring to Bakhmut anyway, despite my attempts to filter those out. Searching on Google News, there were zero Kypuche results, and for Artemivsk and its variations I believe every single result is still about Bakhmut. I don't think this settlement has had any real coverage in Anglophone sources under the name "Artemivsk", before or after 2016. On the other hand, there are a couple sources that do mention it as Kypuche. The OSCE [1] and the Internet Encyclopedia of Ukraine [2] do call it Kypuche. I think if there's a WP:COMMONNAME here - which there probably isn't - it's not Artemivsk.

In the absence of a common name, we should use "Kypuche", for several reasons. This would provide WP:NATURAL disambiguation from Bakhmut, which was also formerly known as Artemivsk, it would have WP:CONSISTENCY with other renamed Ukrainian settlements like Bakhmut, and it is the official name given to the settlement by Ukraine, which is internationally recognized as the legitimate government of the town. This also has precedent with recent moves like the one at Talk:Piatypillia, among others. HappyWith (talk) 00:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Of sources recommended in WP:WIAN:
GNIS[3] gives name Artemivsk, variant name Artemivs’k. (It also has a location called Stantsiya Kipuchaya [Kypucha Station], variant name Kipuchaga, within the city’s boundaries, which held the name since 1878 (uk)).
Maps:
- Google maps gives Artemivs'k.[4]
- Apple Maps gives Kypuche.[5]

This town’s name history seems to be less well recorded than others’ that were recently moved, in this small number of sources. Nevertheless its name change is evident in at least one reliable source, and there’s no reason to treat any of its historical names as the single most COMMONNAME, and the article should be consistently titled per PLACENAME, MODERNPLACENAME, and UAPLACE. —Michael Z. 15:09, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Russian translation of Kypuche

On the Russian Wikipedia version of this page, it lists the Russian translation of Кипуче as Кипучее. I assume this was a typo with an extra е, since I've never seen a Russian toponym that looks like this, but I may be wrong. If anyone can find some sort of official document in Russian mentioning the new name, it would help make 100% sure. HappyWith (talk) 01:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]