Talk:Archaeological tourism

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

This was a bit of a mess. Still looked like a bad translation job. Clearly most of the text was taken from a commercial archaeological tourism website...most likely one of the ones linked to at the bottom. I've removed all the marketing jargon and the links to commercial sites. I've made the information clear and accurate and marked the whole thing as an archaeology stub. It is an interesting topic with a lot of solid academic referencing but I don't have the time to work it up. Hopefully someone else will! Radiotik 07:58, 07 July 2010

This looked like a bad machine translation. Might be from the Spanish wikipedia. I chopped a lot to get it into soemthing that was beginning to sound like English. RJFJR 17:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very poorly written article, and I think I will take some time to hammer it out in the next few days. --Eikenhein 21:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned it up a bit more, but I'm afraid I had to chop out bits that made absolutely no sense at all, and that might have lost a little bit of information. I'll see if I can't find it on the Spanish wiki, and decipher what it was supposed to be. Not sure on the quotes. justice 02:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not from the Spanish wiki, so far as I can tell.justice 02:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This content is directly from one of the links at the bottom of the page: www.ArqueoTour.info and probably should not be used for copyright reasons. Also one of those links is to a site about finding Atlantis and may not be an ideal representative of archaeo-tourism. Nkeller 15:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Archaeological tourism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110127140618/http://articles.cnn.com/2010-11-08/world/pompeii.house.gladiators.collapse_1_frescoes-ancient-roman-city-volcanic-eruption?_s=PM:WORLD to http://articles.cnn.com/2010-11-08/world/pompeii.house.gladiators.collapse_1_frescoes-ancient-roman-city-volcanic-eruption?_s=PM:WORLD

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:53, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

Hello page watchers! I added a template over the section heading I added called "Impact" - I read the tone as quite negatively biased, so perhaps it needs a bit of attention. Lajmmoore (talk) 20:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]