Talk:Anticipatory democracy
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 December 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Original Research
[edit]This article will be deleted, if not supported.
"Be careful not to go too far on the side of not upsetting editors by leaving unsourced information in articles for too long, or at all in the case of information about living people. Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, has said of this: "I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced." Raggz 08:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
It is noted that democracy is not connected to Technocracy http://www.technocracy.org/origins-1.htm
The Origins of Technocracy. That is currently true as explained on an official site by this link.
This article should be deleted. It does not reflect on subjects it tries to describe and seems to be based on pop culture concepts. skip sievert (talk) 23:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Merger proposal
[edit]I recommend the buzzword "Futarchy" be added in here somewhere and the other page be removed. It's even less developed than this one is. Sociotard (talk) 00:39, 14 October 2011 (UTC)