Talk:Anisocytosis

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Anisocytosis.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Is this definition too narrow

I have seen this (in a diagnosis from a doctor) with regard to other types of cells. So I think to say it is a term specific to red blood cells is inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.8.252.37 (talk) 12:31, 23 January 2014 (UTC) I just realized I wasn't signed in when I said that Wiredrabbit (talk) 12:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Need further gradations (from slight to 4+)

Anisocytosis is reported as “slight” to 4+ (“four plus”) and gives the same information as the RDW parameter (red blood cell distribution width): the larger the size variation in the red blood cells, the higher the anisocytosis and RDW results will be. ResearcherQ (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]