Talk:Α-Pyrrolidinopentiophenone

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Α-Pyrrolidinopentiophenone.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Plagiarised?

This page appears to be a direct cut-and-paste of https://www.buzz-wholesale.com/chems/a-PVP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.37.134 (talk • contribs) 2012-03-10T22:36:09‎

Sources to incorporate

Found sources that could be useful: — xaosflux ^Talk 15:00, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using blatantly biased language in objective descriptions.

Using the term "designer drug" is a framing technique that automatically implies or assumes legitimacy of prohibition policies, criminal activity or association with criminal activity, subterfuge, deception, and misrepresentation.

It is the equivalent of using a racial slur, except instead of stereotyping a person through the use of a pejorative term to describe them, comparison is made to existing substance already having widespread acceptance despite being significantly misrepresented and either demonized and/or banned, This guilt by association framing technique then acts as to establish acceptance by the public of prohibition policies being expanded to include this "new" drug, despite there being no actual scientific inquiry or findings delineating the actual attributes of the substance.

Use of the term "designer drug" as a comparative biases the entire entry, and should be abated in this and all other instances in the Wikipedia except those wiki areas where prohibitionists can freely speak their vernacular, and people interested in actual information can easily ignore them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.103.14.252 (talk) 06:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha PVP is a designer drug - look up the definition - what in the holy hell is "biased" about describing it this way? Studies on the negative effects of this "designer drug" abound - it's been around since the 60's. A designer drug (a drug that is created to be only slightly different from an illegal drug so that it will not be considered illegal; an artificially made drug that is used for pleasure) is just that. I'm not sure why you would be offended by the term, particularly when it accurately describes the object in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.16.195.190 (talk) 17:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alpha-Pyrrolidinopentiophenone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150406202220/http://www.soft-tox.org/files/Designer_Drugs/Alpha-PVP.pdf to http://www.soft-tox.org/files/Designer_Drugs/Alpha-PVP.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would it help to state that this drug is a hallucinogenic in the lede if it's backed by reliable sources?

Would it help to state that this drug is a hallucinogenic stimulant in the lede if it's backed by reliable sources? Stating that it's just a stimulant in the lede is not descriptive enough since many stimulants don't cause dissociative states. 2601:940:C000:46A0:8031:F5C0:4974:4C72 (talk) 02:18, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just give the source to debate instead of asking if we can debate of a thread. Hallucinogenic effects are given in the list of secondary effect but source attached is outdated.

Image needed

Aren't there any images of this drug on Commons? 204.11.189.94 (talk) 16:05, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indigenous Peoples' Use

Under "Society and Culture," could you add information on regards to the use of the source plant in indigenous populations? Below I have included one viable source. Thank you.

https://www.justice.gov/archive/ndic/pubs31/31482/index.htm 2600:6C52:44F0:9E90:9DDB:5A67:1847:F7A8 (talk) 16:04, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]