Talk:All I Need Is Love
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
To-do list for All I Need Is Love: Here are some tasks you can do:
References[edit]
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved per request. - GTBacchus(talk) 00:08, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
All I Need is Love → All I Need Is Love – Note the capital 'I' in "Is". This is the capitalisation used on the inside front cover of the 1988 (first) edition. When I requested this renaming as an uncontroversial move, somebody pointed out that this is not how the book is catalogued at WorldCat. However, the book itself is a primary source, and so takes precedence over any error in WorldCat. (I would have renamed the article myself, but it is blocked by the existence of a #REDIRECT.) HairyWombat 19:24, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: I asked that this request be refiled because I didn't think it was uncontroversial, and because librarians disagreed (Worldcat). My guess was that WP:MOS was the right authority to determine title capitalization rather than the book itself. Now I managed to find what I guess is the right passage in MOS: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters)#Composition titles. Per this rule, it seems that 'Is' should be capitalized after all: "all forms of the verb to be" are to be capitalized in book or film titles. In my opinion our own Manual of Style should take precedence over Worldcat's capitalization as well as the book itself. If I were formally voting I would support this move. Since I've expressed an opinion I won't take any action to close this request. EdJohnston (talk) 20:47, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- At WorldCat the book is actually capitalised "All I need is love", which is different from even the current title. This is unsurprising as librarians remove capitals from all but the first word of a book's title (except for any bare 'I's). That is to say, what WorldCat did was never relevant. I agree that Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters)#Composition titles takes precedence over even the primary source. This all means that the renaming can go ahead but, as it has been proposed here, we might as well wait for seven days. HairyWombat 21:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters)#Composition titles. Someone should probably add that to WP:CAPS, which is where one would generally assume to find such information. Jenks24 (talk) 07:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support as above. Deor (talk) 12:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on All I Need Is Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121014222418/http://www.monstersandcritics.com/people/Marlene-Dietrich/biography/ to http://www.monstersandcritics.com/people/Marlene-Dietrich/biography/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)