Talk:Alexander Brailowsky

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Date of birth

My records indicate he was born 16 February 1896. But that was in Russia which used the Old Style (OS) calendar. I don't have enough information to know whether "16 February" was OS (= 28 February NS), or has already been converted to NS (= 4 February OS). JackofOz 09:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

→Whomever wrote the Wili entry has problems with math. At his cited graduation from Kiev Conservatory in 1911, Brailowsky would have been 15 years old. Not impossible but unlikely. However the entry says "At the age of 18, he attended Kiev Conservatory, graduating with a gold medal in 1911." It goes on to cite studies with Leschetizky until 1914 and thereafter with Busoni and finally Francis Plante. So either he was a good deal older or the 1911 date (or perhaps even his birth date) are wrong. Can someone try to clear up the discrepancy. Gillartsny (talk) 00:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BRAILOWSKY 1942.jpg

Image:BRAILOWSKY 1942.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality

Per the Wiki MoS for biographies, the opening paragraph should contain: 1. Name(s) and title(s), if any ... 2. Dates of birth and death, ... 3. Context (location or nationality); 4. The noteworthy position(s) the person held, activities they took part in, or roles they played; 5. Why the person is notable. Ethnicity, religion, or sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless it is relevant to the subject's notability.

Per the above and precedent set in several pages, including Vladimir Horowitz and Arthur Rubinstein, Brailowsky's nationality is listed as Russian since Kiev, the place of his birth, was then part of the Russian Empire. The place for further context is the Early Life section.MisterCSharp (talk) 17:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Number of Chopin pieces.

THe article refers to Brailowsky's programming of "all 160 piano pieces by Chopin" in a series of concerts. But this total is incorrect, and I am wondering whether, and how, this reference should be changed. I tried to total up all the Chopin piano pieces I could think up on the spur of the moment, and it comes to 182 - and I am sure that there are quite a few less known piano pieces by Chopin that I did not think of just now, so even 182 falls short. However, some of these are so little known now that they may even have been quite unknown back in the day when Brailowsky did his series of concerts. So iot doesn't feel quite right to total up all the piano pieces I can find (on imslp.org, for instance), and substitute that number. Yet leaving 160 in feels wrong because it is insufficient.

Does anyone have any suggestions on how (or whether) this needs to be changed? Thank you.M.J.E. (talk) 17:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have a record cover that states, "He made musical history in the spring of 1924 when he conceived the idea of a complete Chopin cycle. In a series of six recitals, he performed 172 of Chopin's solo works, a feat which he has repeated many times since." I'm not a regular contributor -- is that a sufficiently definitive source? I don't think the back cover image here is legible, but this is the album. Kait (talk) 01:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]