Talk:Alberta Senate nominee elections

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: Alberta Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.

Start-class, indeed!

This entry needs a rewrite from top to bottom. There is a lot of hyperbolic bullshit, and scant few facts and refs. I'd delete it, but I don't feel like being bullied again by some jerk with 40,000+ edits (used as proof that I *must* be wrong).

Frankly, is the title even accurate? I'm sure many Albertans think it is, but is an election an election when nobody is actually ELECTED? HuntClubJoe (talk) 19:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

under-represented?

The article says that "Senate reform is popular in Western Canada, where the provinces are under-represented in the House of Commons due to representation by population." But stating that the western provinces are "under-represented" is POV. The residents of those provinces might feel they're under-represented, but the people of Eastern Canada would tend to say that the western provinces have exactly the appropriate level of representation given their lower population. Surely there's a more NPOV way of stating this than what the article currently uses. 207.98.198.84 (talk) 20:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alberta Senate nominee elections. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100501000511/http://www.calgaryherald.com:80/news/Alberta+forego+round+Senate+nominee+elections+Stelmach/2965812/story.html to http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Alberta+forego+round+Senate+nominee+elections+Stelmach/2965812/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]