Talk:HUBO

Robotics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

Apparently 80.229.29.204 was under the impression that an encyclopedia should have wildy original, exciting, unconventional articles. I removed the "Here we go copycat.." and "Please create something original...", which I can only assume was referring to the similiarities between the formatting of this article and the ASIMO article. God forbid someone try to establish standards between articles in the same category. -Asym 11:26, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Asimo

There are multiple mentions of Asimo, but it isn't clear why. If it is for comparison, why only one robot? Also, why is there no in-text link to Asimo, and what is the importance of mentioning several times that Asimo is superior? I feel this does not help the article at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.158.26.253 (talk) 19:35, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bla bla

"although its separate fingers allow it to do rock paper scissor -something that ASIMO cannot do."

Is this meant serious? It would be no big deal to give Asimo better fingers.84.177.200.172 17:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why does it say "sandhu_preetpal@yahoo.co.in"?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HUBO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160428005028/http://www.darparoboticschallenge.org/ to http://www.theroboticschallenge.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal of Albert Hubo into HUBO

I think Albert Hubo should be merged into HUBO, as there is no reason for the page to exist on its own, since all the information there is already on this page (though better sourced there). The main problem of both pages is their overtly promotional tone, but it would probably be easier to fix once a merge is done. Choucas Bleu (T·C) 10:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Five months late, but I don't see a reason why they should be separate anyways. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 18:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 13:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]