Talk:Ajax-class ironclad

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Misdirected Link

The link in the category box at the bottom of the page says "List of Royal Navy Battleships" but actually links to this list of Dreadnought battleships. The class is correctly shown on this list of ironclads. I would make the change myself but I don't know how and I don't want to break the boxes at the bottom of the page. Thanks. Darkstar8799 (talk) 16:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"historical tradition"

Really? What about the fact that Defence was ordered as part of the same four-ship programme as the Warrior class? They were designed as a smaller alternative for assessment purposes. The actual follow-on to Warrior was, of course, the 400-foot Achilles. The follow-on to Defence was Hector.

And what about the Hero being followed by the not-smaller Sans Pareil?

Devastation followed by Dreadnought?

Are we being encyclopedic or are we just posting up fun biased pub factoids in this article? 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:9534:E525:4832:87A7 (talk) 02:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]