This article was nominated for deletion on July 11, 2024. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
Happy to change to either Health of Joe Biden or Age and health of Joe Biden after the AfD has completed. I think the title should mention age as that seems to be the main issue - this is different to Trump, where there is more speculation on physical/psychological health concerns on top of the age concerns. GnocchiFan (talk) 11:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I guess that grammatical bit is technically correct, however, while it does look as though he's not concerned himself, it seems like he ultimately is, even if he appears not to be, and I think it was intended and understood that "of" was meant in the sense of "having to do with". If you change it to "about", that could mean "age and concerns around Joe Biden", which could widen the scope of the conversation so as to make it less precise and accurate than you intend. Tyrekecorrea (talk) 12:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I just added a reference at the end of the article’s overview. Since there were no other references in that paragraph, I wondered if that was the right place for this reference. Before I added the reference, the information in the second paragraph was unsourced. 76.170.142.83 (talk) 03:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can write the contents of this page on the Joe Biden page, but no, there has to be a separate page for every little thiny thing. The site is completely unnecessary. Cenbutz1 (talk) 08:49, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I fully agree. This doesn't need to be its own article. It's an aggregate of current news, doesn't provide new information, and is filled with speculation. I further don't see how future information could add enough to justify this pages current existence.