Talk:Afrikaans

Languages Top‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Africa High‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Namibia Mid‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Namibia (assessed as High-importance).

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

This article is written in South African English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

"WIKIPEDIA FIXES AFRIKAANS SPEAKERS FIGURE FROM 44 BACK TO 17 MILLION". Eyewitness News (South Africa). 18 November 2022. Wikipedia has since corrected the figure, but Theron's comments have ruffled some feathers.

Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Geographic distribution

Is it relevant to point out that there are 36 speakers in Mauritius and 122 in Finland? I think we should stick to countries that have at least 1,000 speakers on the table. 2600:1702:6D0:5160:59CC:F3DA:7940:1F39 (talk) 01:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ 41.198.147.59 (talk) 07:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure there aren't 54 million native speakers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:8185:5900:D539:399:882D:11D7 (talk) 14:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Error(s) with respect to diminutive forms

The current article text contains:

”The diminutive suffix in Afrikaans is -tjie, -djie or -ie, whereas in Dutch it is -tje or dje, hence a "bit" is ŉ bietjie in Afrikaans and beetje in Dutch.”

This contains certainly one error and probably several errors.

There is definitely no Dutch diminutive suffix form “-dje”. If “dje” occurs as the last part of a diminutive form, the “d” is part of the root of the word, e.g. liedje, lidje, leedje, ledje, meidje, stuudje, studje, huidje, bloedje, broodje, bodje, woudje, paadje, padje, deugdje, voogdje, maagdje, smaragdje, schildje, beeldje, speldje, schuldje, koboldje, naaldje, wereldje, beemdje, hemdje, vriendje, kindje, eendje, endje, eindje, rundje, hondje, maandje, mandje, duizendje, zwoerdje, lieverdje, nerdje, boordje, bordje, gaardje, gardje, honderdje, etc.

The rules for the Dutch diminutive forms are moderately complicated. Suffice it to say that the diminutive suffix surfaces as one of (only) five forms: -je, -pje, -tje, -kje and -etje.

According to https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-ie#Afrikaans, Afrikaans similarly has: -jie, -pie, -tjie, -kie and -etjie. Under the assumption that this is the full list of forms, “-ie” and “-djie” are not diminutive forms.

Who can confirm the Afrikaans diminutive forms?Redav (talk) 12:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans

paragraph of bywoorde

197.233.0.167 (talk) 11:45, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but not helpful 197.233.0.167 (talk) 11:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Natuurwetenskap

Verduidelike hoe die litosfeer en hidrosfeer mekaar beinvloed 165.0.72.220 (talk) 12:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This question is off-topic here. This article is about the language itself while the question asks about a scientific topic. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]