Jump to content

Talk:African crake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:African Crake)
Featured articleAfrican crake is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 18, 2015.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 19, 2011Featured article candidatePromoted
October 22, 2011Featured topic candidatePromoted
September 30, 2020Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Featured article

Although I don't doubt it, I can't find a source for the mascarene islands jimfbleak 14:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find it again.......must have been hallucinating!! Paul venter 17:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

[edit]

Ok - musings below: Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think any info on why it was placed in different genera would be very welcome in the taxo section, otherwise it does come across as a bit list-y.
  • No subspecies or regional variation?
  • I'll expand taxo to give more detail, probably tomorrow now. I've said that there are no subspecies or regional variation in "Description". Would it be better in Taxonomy? Thanks for suggestions Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:30, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency

[edit]

"The African crake is a smallish crake" vs "The African crake is larger than the corn crake". Not sure if it's the smallish crake, but it's definitely smaller than corn crake.--Vicpeters (talk) 20:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AEWA

[edit]

The species is listed in official site of this organization as Crecopsis egregia. Is information in Status section outdated?--Vicpeters (talk) 16:27, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on African crake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Normative usage of "genus"

[edit]

For the normative syntax of the combination of "genus" with an associated Linnaean name, see any of the following Google Ngrams: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6. I hope the pattern is obvious. WolfmanSF (talk) 05:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]