Talk:Advocate general (European Union)
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Advocate General (European Union))
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Advocate general (European Union) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Advocate general (European Union) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:07, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
( )
... that thanks to Advocate General's opinions, one is likely to know the outcome of the court case before the European Court of Justice before it even starts drafting the ruling?Source: "likely to know": see in-article stats on convergence of AG's and Court's opinion; "before it even starts drafting the ruling": [1]- ALT1 ... that thanks to the Advocate General's opinion, one is likely to know the outcome of a court case before the European Court of Justice before it even starts drafting the ruling?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Political prisoners in Poland
- Comment: Co-reviewed with Mottezen
Created by Szmenderowiecki (talk). Self-nominated at 12:09, 11 October 2021 (UTC).
- @Szmenderowiecki: This impressive and well-written article is new enough and long enough. I have added ALT1, because there is only one Advocate General for any one case. What do you think? The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sure. It's only changing articles (a/the), which I may still sometimes confuse even though my English is pretty good. Thanks for the review. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 06:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Your English is excellent. Striking ALT0. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:27, 29 October 2021 (UTC)