Talk:Battle of Suwon Airfield/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Canpark (talk) 10:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article by the end of the week.Canpark (talk) 10:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
The reference materials checked out, and references were used throughout the article.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
The article appears to be written mostly from the U.S. perspective, but the tone and language of the article do not indicate any sense of bias.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Generally the article is well written, but I've noticed a few minor things that needs fixing before I could pass it as GA.

Firstly, there is a link to the Far East Air Force, but both the British and the Americans had a 'Far East Air Force', so which country's 'Far East Air Force' are we referring to? Please provide the link to the right article.
- Fixed. —Ed!^(talk) 14:22, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Secondly, this sentence also requires clarification: "The North Koreans would capture the city the next day forcing the government and its shattered army to retreat further south." Which government and which army? Your obviously referring to the South Koreans here, but when I first read this article, I thought this requires clarification.Canpark (talk) 12:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. —Ed!^(talk) 14:22, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]