Talk:D.R.U.G.S. (album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Post-hardcore Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Post-hardcore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of post-hardcore and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Post-hardcoreWikipedia:WikiProject Post-hardcoreTemplate:WikiProject Post-hardcorePost-hardcore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title?

The citation for the album art and alleged album name states that it is self-titled. ~Ambrosia- ^talk 22:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

THE ALBUM IS SELF TITLED. the album cover and the official website states so... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.215.149.226 (talk) 00:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved, needed history-merge. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abigail Will Be Born with Four Friendly Eyes → D.R.U.G.S. (album) — Title used on official website and in most sources, appears to be confirmed now. Article was previously at that title so a page history merge would be needed. --Peter E. James (talk) 18:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support, per nom and iTunes listing. --KЯĀŽΨÇÉV13 18:43, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support for reasons listed by krazycev. - Jer757 19:25, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, clearly there's no opposition. Should we close this discussion? I'm really seeing no liable reason to leave it with this title, as it's wrong. --KЯĀŽΨÇÉV13 12:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.