Talk:A Most Violent Year

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Most Violent Year. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141027125747/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/news/1931960/gotham_independent_film_awards_2014_nominations/?adid=home_hero2 to http://www.rottentomatoes.com/news/1931960/gotham_independent_film_awards_2014_nominations/?adid=home_hero2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to remove “box office bomb” from article

Proposal to remove “box office bomb” from article.

My apologies in advance for formatting, etc. I’m on mobile.

Does “A Most Violent Year” really qualify as a box office bomb according to the definitions in the *sources* for the box office bomb (BOB) article? I say that it does not.

Yes, under the terms of the BOB *article*, it’s a bomb:

“Although any film for which the production, marketing, and distribution costs combined exceed the revenue after release has technically "bombed", the term is more frequently used for major studio releases that were highly anticipated, extensively marketed and expensive to produce that ultimately failed commercially.”

But it’s not a bomb according to the BOB article’s *sources*.

“A Most Violent Year” had little marketing spent on it and it cost only $20 million to produce:

“‘A Most Violent Year’ cost about $20 million to make. And, like Mr. Chandor’s earlier films, “Margin Call” and “All Is Lost,” its promotion will depend more heavily on publicity than on advertising. By contrast, “Interstellar” cost about $165 million and will be backed by a large ad budget.”

An $8 million loss is a small amount in the film business and the amount of loss matters:

“What makes a movie a box office “bomb ”? Just losing money doesn’t make it qualify. It’s the amount of loss from the production costs to ticket receipts that makes the difference.”

“A Most Violent Year” does not meet the standards for a BOB according to the standards in the sources cited for the BOB article because it’s small numbers:

“For example, 2006’s Zyzzyx Road took in a shocking thirty (30) dollars at the box office, but since it cost only $1 million to make, it d didn’t lose enough money to make the list. And the 2000 John Travolta vehicle Battlefield Earth made back less than half of its $73 million budget, but losing a mere $43 million makes it only a modest disaster.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box-office_bomb#

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/06/business/media/jessica-chastain-in-a-publicity-tug-of-war.html

https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/rl3110438401/weekend/

https://www.filmsite.org/greatestflops.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2012/03/20/The-15-Biggest-Box-Office-Bombs.html

Thank you editors and fellow Wikipedians for your consideration.

Bdat2020 (talk) 06:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]