Jump to content

Talk:All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:AIIMS, New Delhi)

File:All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Logo).jpg is non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Logo).jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 10:41, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on All India Institute of Medical Sciences Delhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy regarding its Director

[edit]

The Director of AIIMS was sacked in 2006, after a controversy resulting in a case before the Delhi High Court. This happened as a result of a resolution which was passed by the 17 member governing body of the institute. Many people have touted this to be an extension of the Ramadoss (The Union Health Minister & The President of AIIMS) and P Venugopal rivalry. On 8 May 2008, Venugopal was re-instated as AIIMS director by a Supreme Court judgement.

I moved the above here as it has no sourcing, violating WP:BLP, and it smacks of scandal mongering in violation o WP:NOTSCANDAL. --Ronz (talk) 19:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]