Talk:9.0: Live

9.0: Live has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 12, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
August 7, 2008	Featured topic candidate	Not promoted
September 5, 2008	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
September 16, 2008	Good topic candidate	Not promoted
October 2, 2008	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
November 21, 2008	Good topic candidate	Not promoted
July 28, 2009	Good topic candidate	Promoted
Current status: Good article

Slipknot (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slipknot, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SlipknotWikipedia:WikiProject SlipknotTemplate:WikiProject SlipknotSlipknot articles

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Fair use rationale for Image:Slipknot90.jpg

Image:Slipknot90.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Band Personel

I added a personel section to the article, because it is one of the requirements of a good article. I used the same info that was listed on Vol 3. (with the exception of Joey playing the bass, which I don't believe he does live). If there are any differences / additions please correct them. Thank You! Blackngold29 (talk) 16:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The credits of the band that is listed in the CD booklet are as follows:

SLIPKNOT

no. 0 SID
no. 5 133
no. 1 JOEY
no. 7 MICK
no. 2 PAUL
no. 8 COREY
no. 4 JAMES
no. 6 CLOWN
no. 3 CHRIS

should the credits be listed as this instead, only nicknames, without instruments? Blackngold29 (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should list the instruments b/c a lot of people don't know what member does what, even some fans. Dark Executioner (talk) 23:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:9.0: Live/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

"9.0: Live is the first live album released by American metal band Slipknot. It was released on 1 November, 2005 by Roadrunner Records" - can you not use released twice? maybe just "first live album by American band..."?
- Done
"The album was recorded during the band's world tour in support of their third studio album Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses) from 2004 to 2005." - commas around the album title, delink the years
- Done
Every sentence in the lead starting with "the album" isn't pretty...
- Done
Rolling Stone needs italics throughout (magazine; MOS:ITALICS).
- Done
  - Still spotted some issues in ref publishers (check all). —Giggy 08:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done if threes any more can you please identify them. REZTER ^TALK ø 11:36, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Try and include all the reviews in the reception section in the infobox and vice versa.
- The MusicOMH review isn't starred, so does it really belong? Black ngold29 07:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yeah, use something like "(positive)" where the stars would normally go. eg. Diorama (album) —Giggy 08:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done REZTER ^TALK ø 11:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"which was removed from Slipknot due to copyright reasons" - "due to copyright reasons" is poor wording... perhaps "due to copyright issues" (the "due" and "reasons" are somewhat redundant)
- Done
Check italics for PopMatters.
- Done
http://www.musicomh.com/albums/slipknot_1105.htm says it's rarely played live, not that it's never been played live ("as well as the first ever live performance of "Skin Ticket""). It also doesn't mention "Iowa" despite being the ref used for that statement.
- The "first ever live performance" comes from the album itself. Before the song starts the singer says, 'This is a song we've never done live before, ever' or something to that effect. Should we just cite the album somehow? Black ngold29 07:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yep, just say in a ref that it's part of the album. —Giggy 08:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done REZTER ^TALK ø 11:45, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And please leave me a note when done. Cheers, —Giggy 07:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing; where does the album's title come from? —Giggy 07:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The band has 9 members, and it's live... so there ya go, I guess. Black ngold29 07:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hmm... no sources backing this up so you can say it in the article? —Giggy 08:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - No there's no sources or anything of bands explaining the title... it is kind of self explanatory but you can't put it in the article without sources. REZTER ^TALK ø 11:55, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.

Cheers, —Giggy 08:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:9.0: Live/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Article requirements:

Y A relatively complete infobox
Y Cover art in the infobox
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
Y At least one section of informative prose other than lead
Y A track listing (for start), containing track lengths & composers (B)
Y A list of personnel (specific band members (for start), guest musicians and technical (for B))

Categorisation at least by artist and year

Last edited at 06:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 9.0: Live. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 9.0: Live. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081213003100/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=42847 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=42847

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]