Talk:82nd Sustainment Brigade/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:82nd Sustainment Brigade (United States)/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- In the Origins section, "In 1983 the unit again deployed to combat", add a comma after "1983".
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:33, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- In the Origins section, "In 1983 the unit again deployed to combat", add a comma after "1983".
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Dates need to be unlinked, per here. Throughout the article, link "COL", "band", "Australian", and "Romanian" to their correspondence articles. In the Activation section, it would be best if "United States Army Forces Command" was followed by ---> (FORSCOM), I mean, I know what it means, but how 'bout your reader.
- Half-check. Dates need to be unlinked. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:33, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Dates need to be unlinked, per here. Throughout the article, link "COL", "band", "Australian", and "Romanian" to their correspondence articles. In the Activation section, it would be best if "United States Army Forces Command" was followed by ---> (FORSCOM), I mean, I know what it means, but how 'bout your reader.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Not much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:54, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Fixed all of the above. -Ed!(talk)(Hall of Fame) 05:28, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:58, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
