Talk:57th parallel south

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Geographical coordinates

57th parallel south is of interest to WikiProject Geographical coordinates, which encourages the use of geographical coordinates in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Geographical coordinatesWikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinatesTemplate:WikiProject Geographical coordinatesGeographical coordinates articles

IHO

In the preface of the third edition the IHO states that the limits Pacific-Atlantic are proposed and they are not to be regarded as representing the result of full geographic studies.

So, the reason IHO definition isn't a definition but a proposal. Moreover, the IHO states that this has not been accepted by Chile nor Argentina. As the definition has for Argentina some geopolitical relevance, Wikipedia should reflects the exact content of the source. --Best regards, Keysanger (what?) 20:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The International Hydrographic Organization states that "The Southern boundary line between the South Atlantic and South Pacific Oceans is the meridian of Cape Horn (67°16'W)". Yes, this may not be 100% official or accepted, but it is at least a definition from a reputable source. You arbitarily changed the boundary to 57°16'W, which is much less official and essentially dreamed up out of nowhere. Sorry if you don't like the IHO definition (which I will properly reference in the article), but unless you can provide a WP:RS for your alternative, then we can't possibly accept it. Bazonka (talk) 20:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we"?, you?. --Best regards, Keysanger (what?) 14:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I meant the Wikipedia community. Sorry, of course I shouldn't speak on behalf of everyone, but my point still stands - the Wikipedia policy is that reliable sources should be used, and you can't just change the referenced information unless you have a alternative reliable source, and even then the change should be discussed unless entirely non-controversial. Bazonka (talk) 18:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 57th parallel south. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111008191433/http://www.iho-ohi.net/iho_pubs/standard/S-23/S23_1953.pdf to http://www.iho-ohi.net/iho_pubs/standard/S-23/S23_1953.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]