Talk:HR 515

Requested move 30 July 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 01:59, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3 Arietis → HR 515: As seen in a SIMBAD search, the designation "HR 515" is used much more often for this object than any other designation, and thus should be moved per WP:COMMONNAME. The Flamsteed designation this article is currently at is misleading, as the star is not even in Aries, and is never used in peer-reviewed literature. --Relisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:46, 7 August 2014 (UTC) User:StringTheory11 13:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

Any additional comments:

Comment whatever happens, VY Piscium should either redirect here or be the article's name. Same with HR 515. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:52, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:33, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I take it this is one of the stars that changed constellations from the redefinition of the constellations in the 1920s? -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 08:42, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe so. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:33, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Unreferenced?

I've removed the unreferenced tag [1], it seems to be a dirty great lie. Andrewa (talk) 02:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HR 515. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140808050617/http://www.astrostudio.org/xhip.php?hip=8271 to http://www.astrostudio.org/xhip.php?hip=8271

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]