Talk:36th European Film Awards

Europe Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Awards

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Layout: flag soup

While it's been seemingly traditional for a while in the set of EFA articles (for horror vacui or whatever other reason), the addition of the ineffable flag soup turns this and other articles into a barely legible untidy mess in which countries seem to be more important from a visual standpoint than the nominees themselves. In addition, the incidence of the flag soup in boxes corresponding to people adds further awkwardness and dire original research issues. Sources about the EFA awards often do not back up the mention of the country in most categories, not to say that they virtually never endorse the country + flag approach. It's worth mentioning too that there is no bi-univocal country-picture relation. The flags provide little to no value. The visual prosopography they may provide could be accounted for in an addendum whenever secondary sources feel compelled to highlight it.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]