Talk:BBC Studios Home Entertainment/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about BBC Studios Home Entertainment. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2 Entertain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.2entertain.co.uk/documents/pressrelease.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Scare Factor?
What is the point of this highly trivial and per definition subjective elaborations? It seems that a description of the logos in so much detail would be better kept on a website about Logo-design and comparative video-intro-analysis, having several pages / screens full of verbal descriptions of a moving company symbol inside an informative, encyclopedic article looks pretty suspect and if it adds Original Research like the examples from the section header title it's in conflict with the Guidelines for WP articles too.
Would it be acceptable to keep something like a timeline for these intro-icons or should better the whole long treatise go and the article get streamlined to the relevant parts? --178.203.29.150 (talk) 16:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)