Jump to content

Talk:2,4,5-Trimethoxyphenethylamine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:2C-O)

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to 2,4,5-trimethoxyphenethylamine. EdJohnston (talk) 21:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


2C-OTMPEA --Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 23:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC) The name 2C-O appears non-canonical. Shulgin names it TMPEA in PIHKAL and most of the literature refers to it as such. Jansen did not assign a trivial name for this compound. Although the compound belongs with the class of 2C-compounds, the name TMPEA should be used with 2C-O and TMPEA-2 as synonyms. See also http://isomerdesign.com/PiHKAL/explore.php?domain=pk&id=168 and http://www.erowid.org/library/books_online/pihkal/pihkal168.shtml. --Relisted. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC) --Relisted. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:38, 3 March 2014 (UTC) --Pjw154 (talk) 20:36, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: I am relisting this for a second time, and will notify the two wikiprojects whose banner appears above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If we want it to have a more canonical name then the most simple acceptable new name would be TMPEA-2 but if that's not a name that's already in use then I think we ought to be using 2,4,5-trimethoxyphenethylamine. Testem (talk) 13:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I would go with 2,4,5-trimethoxyphenethylamine, with TMPEA-2 as another redirect to it. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:43, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.