Talk:2020 Wyoming Democratic presidential caucuses

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Presidential elections / Wyoming Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).
	Wyoming portal This article is supported by WikiProject Wyoming (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

MSU Billings Poll

The MSU Billings poll (here [1]) apparently has a sample size of 14 Democratic caucus-goers. However, none of the candidate percentages are possible with only 14 respondents. For Warren, 82% of 14 is 11.48 people. For the undecideds, 16% of 14 is 2.24 undecided voters. If a candidate got exactly 1 respondent out of the set of 14, they would get 7.14%, so I have no idea how Yang has 2%, Klobuchar has 1%, and Delaney has "less than 1%". I don't think it's possible for the sample size to be 14. Does anyone know what's going on here? Maybe I'm reading it wrong. Jacoby531 (talk) 23:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The poll's result has been weighted, which is perfectly normal but less noticeable when a given weighting corresponds to a potential result from a typically higher sample size. PutItOnAMap (talk) 16:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this poll is not a big deal, given small sample size, relatively old age in this constantly changing political race, and everything else, but I don't even see in the 26-page pdf file a single reference to there being 14 respondents for the Democratic caucus. There were 177 likely voters polled from Wyoming, evidently including Republican, Independent, and Democrat respondents, but I don't see anywhere that the document breaks down the percentage, let alone absolute numbers, of respondents with each of these 3 affiliations. Can anyone point to that number? El piel (talk) 23:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2020 Alabama Democratic primary which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc notice

Editors of this page are encouraged to participate in an Rfc on Talk:2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries pertaining to the infobox of this page and all state by state primary pages. The Rfc is about candidates who have withdrawn. Smith0124 (talk) 00:53, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]