Jump to content

Talk:2020–2022 catalytic converter theft ring/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: CommissarDoggo (talk · contribs) 21:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 03:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This looks interesting. I'll review shortly. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Prose is good. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Per below. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issues have been fixed IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). I spot-checked some of the more used sources as well as some random ones and found no issues. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2c. it contains no original research. IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Broad. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
7. Overall assessment. Prose is good, well sourced, article passes GAC. I had a blast with this review! IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only reason that the lead has sources is because of Its dismantlement in 2022 was described as the first known interdiction of such a criminal scheme, which didn't appear to fit anywhere else at the time, however I'll take a peek around at the Aftermath section as it should fit in there nicely. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As for how short it is, I'll mess about with it and see how much it can be expanded, as there's definitely plenty to go in. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Visually the lead looks much better already but I will do a more thourough read through later. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • generated $545 million Is that the amount they sold it for or the value of what they sold? Could you clarify? IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Strangely I don't believe any sources actually stated definitively whether it was the actual value that they sold it for or the damages. Just based on the wording of the sources used I'd say it's revenue generated, as I believe that's the wording used in the DoJ releases, but I'll go back into the sources and try to find some clarity. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • with the majority earned through the DG Auto Parts corporation Is this the company they sold the converters to? If so could you specify that? IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    ...Strangely enough I don't actually know where I got that from, I'll clarify it. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The money earned would then be divided between the owners of the company I may be overthinking but was the money divided between the owners of DG Auto Parts or the criminal group? IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Nah you're not overthinking, it is a bit weirdly worded. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The investigation began in late 2020 and early 2021 in Oklahoma during a wave of catalytic converter thefts in Tulsa. What prompted the investigation? Was it the stolen converters? If so maybe reword to reflect that. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The investigation was prompted by the wave of catalytic converter thefts, however weirdly enough I can't find the exact reason why I worded it like that in the main body, but I'm fairly certain it came from source 17; "Oklahoma, like the rest of the country, had been experiencing an astonishing rise in thefts of the devices...The officers called in a lieutenant who’d been working with the FBI to investigate the wave of thefts...The case might have ended there. But in the months before the traffic stop, as the police tried to get a handle on the theft problem," Regardless, I'll reword it to reflect the source better and to clarify things. CommissarDoggoTalk? 10:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Your changes to the lead so far have made a lot of improvement, thank you! IntentionallyDense (talk) 17:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • By September, a team of investigators had linked Curtis Cores, a company owned by Tyler Curtis then suspected of buying and selling stolen catalytic converters, with DG Auto Parts, a company in Freehold, New Jersey, which was a recipient of the stolen catalytic converters, owned by Navin and Tinu Khanna. This is a really long and somewhat hard-to-follow sentence. Could you rephrase a bit? IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Background

[edit]

Initial investigation

[edit]
  • The police then attempted to flip the cutters for their fences. Could you expand on what this means? Specifically the usage of the terms "flip" and "fences". IntentionallyDense (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Would this be any better? CommissarDoggoTalk? 18:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:18, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The warehouse was owned by Tyler Curtis Which warehouse? IntentionallyDense (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The warehouse directly refers to the prior sentence, "In May 2021, GPS tracked Low's vehicle to an automobile recycling warehouse on Oklahoma State Highway 51 in Broken Arrow." CommissarDoggoTalk? 18:15, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oops thanks for pointing this out. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:18, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • improbably-named Kansas Core What do you mean by this? IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Several weeks after Kansas Core gained the warrant to surveil Curtis Cores, he gained a search warrant for Curtis's Facebook account. Is the Kansas Core one person? IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm going to answer both this and the prior question with the same answer as I feel they might be related, that and it's very fun to explain it. Kansas Core is one person, he's one of the initial investigators on the case. I didn't initially write about how improbable his name was, that was later added for clarification. I originally wrote his full name, Kansas Core, and then in later inclusions simply stated his last name, as per policy. This turned out to be somewhat of an issue I was blind to, as noted on a reply to a Twitter post by Depths of Wikipedia on the article that it was quite confusing that a man with the last name Core was investigating Curtis Cores. As such, all subsequent uses contained his full name to maintain clarity.
    It was later put in invisible text I believe during or directly following the DYK that an editor simply didn't believe that that was his name, wish I could find the diff. It was later stated that that is in fact his name, and the source specifically states; Yet the case still might have fizzled if not for the presence, in Tulsa’s Riverside Street Crimes Unit, of an officer with the improbable name Kansas Core ... The cat racket was hardly a choice assignment. “There’s this ‘We don’t care about catalytic converters, because it’s a property crime’ ” camp at the department, Staggs says. “It’s not a sexy crime. It’s not the robberies and the homicides.” When the previous commander gave Core the case, it wasn’t exactly hazing, but it wasn’t far off. “I’m pretty sure that lieutenant basically was like, ‘Core, you’re the up-and-coming guy,’ ” Staggs says. “ ‘Your last name is Core, and all the criminals call these cores. Here you go.’ ”
    It was then later added by another user how improbable the name is, reflecting the wording in the source, leading to the current improbably-named Kansas Core wording. If you want it changed then by all means, I just thought I'd explain the whole thing. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh that makes much more sense thank you for clarifying. No need to change anything I was just very confused. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:58, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edwards "I didn't deal with that guy [Navin Khanna] much. Curtis dealt with him...I did talk to the guy—just kind of rubbed me the wrong way." I think this is meant to say "Edwards said". IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I, in fact, most certainly did. CommissarDoggoTalk? 09:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dismantling the state theft rings

[edit]

Sting operations at DG Auto Parts

[edit]

Operation Heavy Metal

[edit]

Aftermath

[edit]

Overall

[edit]

What an interesting article. I really enjoyed doing this review. I hope the amount of feedback I gave hasn't been discouraging at all. Thank you for getting back to me so quickly throughout this review. I believe with some very minor tweaks regarding prose this article meets GAC. IntentionallyDense (talk) 01:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all, I'm just glad it's almost across the line after all this time, and the amount of feedback definitely wasn't discouraging. I'm actually pretty happy to have finally learned how to avoid proseline haha
I'm really glad you liked it, because I had an absolute blast researching and finishing it off for Vami back then. CommissarDoggoTalk? 11:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Everything looks good. I'm going to go ahead and pass this! IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.