Talk:Kerch Strait incident

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kerch Strait incident article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 60 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

A news item involving Kerch Strait incident was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 27 November 2018.

Wikipedia

European history

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Russia: Military

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Ukraine

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

What relevance to mentioning anti-air batteries in Crimea

Nicoljaus reverted my removal of mention of anti-air batteries in Crimea as irrelevant to the Kerch Strait event. Rather than reverting the reversion, I am asking for a broader judgement of relevance. It would be extremely easy and even further irrelevant to add any number of other Ukrainian and Russian actions to this article but I think there are logical limits.Moryak (talk) 23:32, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On the one hand, sources note that deployment of AA batteries happened after the incident or even link it to. On the other, however, plans for such deployment were reported well before this incident. So, I have some doubts that this can be considered a response to the incident. After all, denunciation of the Russo-Ukrainian Friendship treaty and Ukraine's plans to introduce resolution on Azov Sea into UNGA aren't reactions to the Kerch Strait incident as well - since both were considered and (in case of the Friendship treaty) initiated before this incident. Same goes for batteries then. --Seryo93 (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Complex issue. I canceled the deletion because I had seen at the ref - two events were correlated there. If the deployment was done according to the previous plans - perhaps this is really unnecessary to be mentioned. But best of all, in my opinion, to mention both the fact that C-400 was soon deployed, and that this relocation was planned in advance. Thus, the information will be the most complete and objective.--Nicoljaus (talk) 14:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the analytical material where it says: For its part, Moscow has moved additional anti-ship and advanced air defence missiles into the region.--Nicoljaus (talk) 14:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

add Trump blocks condemnation?

Trump W.H. Blocked Condemnation Of Russian Aggression: Diplomat on YouTube Oct 30, 2019 MSNBC

X1\ (talk) 00:08, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Background

The paragraph detailing the Ukrainian "Operation" seem a little overly detailed e.g. the age of the ships --Nilsol2 (talk) 09:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]