Talk:2014 raid on Idlib city

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 raid on Idlib city article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Syria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

pro-Rebels news agency also reported that Syrian army retook Tall Mastumeh few hours ago - a 2017 reader will be puzzled--78.0.8.44 (talk) 13:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Even SOHR dont claim 70 regime officers dead

What a lie is being spread over the Attack it was repulsed the same day it was reported and 02 British press agencies claims 70 regime officers dead, even al-Qaeda claims 12 captured, but nothing of 70 beheaded, cmon, SOHR cant lie in this. Whos behind the disinformation british Inteligence Agencies?? Cmon dont believe that.200.48.214.19 (talk) 22:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion on the main map talk page. I agree, these seem to be editorial error. 2602:30A:C01B:89F0:50D2:46CF:1649:D16B (talk) 23:58, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also the article mentions that ISIS attacked Idlib (while it was Nusra), so the article should not be taken seriously — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.215.136.128 (talk) 11:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daily mail have showed lack of credability with the article they posted yesterday. As its now the WP article look Ok but with the (alleged) caption after the source.200.48.214.19 (talk) 14:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 2014 Idlib city raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]