Talk:2010s in political history

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

2010s Low‑importance

	2010s portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Nothing on Canada?

There is no mention of political happenings in Canada under Regional Politics. E.g. election of Justin Trudeau, etc. Yet most other countries are covered, no matter what their size. Tony (talk) 18:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delineation of article scope

the current decade seemed to be the most simplest way to delineate this article, even though there are less than four weeks until the next decade starts. we can reconsider the scope of this article if necessary, or else simply start a new article for the 2020s when needed. --Sm8900 (talk) 16:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

by the way, if this article gets too big or unwieldy, we can always split it up by continent, eg 2010s political history of Asia. just a thought. --Sm8900 (talk) 22:01, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Items copied from other Wikipedia pages

I have copied and edited some of the material used in the summaries of armed violence in Africa during the early part of the decade. Michael E Nolan (talk) 18:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't they be transcluded rather than copied, Michael E Nolan? Guarapiranga (talk) 05:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

possible article name

we may change the name of this article to List of political events in 2010s. or else maybe to 2010s in politics and government. this is to reflect that this article is not a full historical chronicle of the 2010s in world politics. --Sm8900 (talk) 01:24, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article structure makes no sense

It makes no sense to divide events into the early and late parts of the decade. Too many things had influence throughout the 10 years (or, say, 2012-2018), and it's frustrating for the reader to have to suddenly scroll down to continue reading about a topic. Plus, the writing won't be as cohesive for the national entries. I will merge the sections if there is no good reason not to.

Keepcalmandchill (talk) 06:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, but I disagree. we split up historical articles by era all the time. If any topic needs to be covered over the full ten-year period, then each country has its own current history article anyway, in which to do so. so therefore, the division between the first and second halves of the decade should remain. besides, we only put it there to defer to other editors' sensibilities.

some may feel the opposite from your suggestion; i.e., some information might be out of date if we tried to apply it to the entire decade; however if we clearly indicate such data as being for the first half of the 2010s, then we are honest about how far or how much it has been updated.

I do appreciate your comments. tagging Michael E Nolan, for his comments as well. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 01:21, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hm, well, since you already made the changes, I will simply let things be. if others wish to discuss, or provide alternate approaches, we welcome all ideas here. Keepcalmandchill, I do appreciate your thoughtful ideas, and your helpful work on this article. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I like the current division by region and issue. Obviously, issues often transcend national boundaries and even continents; similarly, current events usually relate to earlier events and often go on for decades. We can use a similar organization in the article 2020s in political history.Michael E Nolan (talk) 20:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of group resource

I would like to invite any interested editors here to join the task force for Contemporary History. One of our core goals is to highlight and promote the coverage of contemporary history as its own distinct area here at Wikipedia.

We differ from a simple effort to cover current events, in that we seek to provide the editing community with resources that would allow it to provide broad and comprehensive coverage of articles on contemporary history as a broad topical field, rather than simply on individual current events as they may occur.

to that end, we have set up articles such as 2020s in political history, which allow the whole editing community to adopt a broad scope in keeping wikipedia updated with broad historical trends, topics and events, as they occur, but also as they become relevant to the field of history overall. I hope that sounds helpful and worthwhile to you. you are welcome to join us in any way, or to offer any input or ideas that you may wish. we welcome your input. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 15:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]