Talk:2007 Scottish Challenge Cup final/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"and St. Johnstone on 25 November " think this needs a "held" before the on, or similar.
- changed to "and St. Johnstone, held on 25 November..."
"The match was Dunfermline's second appearance..." by this point I think we would need to reiterate which match you're talking about.
- Changed to "The 2007 final was Dunfermline's second appearance..." to make clear which match it is referring to.
" lost in 1996" avoid that Easter egg (particularly when you have "in 1990" unlinked in the previous para).
- Unlinked the "1996" article, as requested above.
"St. Johnstone took a 3-goal..." -> "St. Johnstone took a 3–0 lead within the first 30 minutes with a penalty from... and goals from ... and ..."?
- Incorporated the requested improvement into the article.
"With 20 minutes left to play in the second half, Stephen Glass scored a penalty for Dunfermline to make it 3–2 which is how the scoreline remained until the end, with St. Johnstone winning its first national cup trophy in its 123-year history." would be good to split this, and avoid the "which is how..." which isn't great prose.
- Reworded to "In the 70th minute, Stephen Glass scored the final goal of the game for Dunfermline from a penalty to make it 3–2. St. Johnstone's victory was the first time the club had won a national cup trophy in its 123-year history."
"The competition is a ..." surely "was" as there's no way of telling what may happen to the competition now and in the future.
- Corrected to "was".
"last season's" previous season's.
- Changed, as requested.
" at Excelsior Stadium.[4] " wouldn't we normally say "at the Excelsior Stadium"?
- I believe both may be acceptable but have changed to include "the" anyway.
"before Stephen Glass scored" don't think you need to repeat his first name.
- I'm unsure as to what you mean here. His first name is only mentioned in the lead and once again near the end of the article in the match report section.
  - Generally, in most prose I've read, once you've mentioned someone's first name, you don't need to do it again unless their surname is ambiguous. I'm referring to WP:SURNAME, while it's for bios, I tend to apply it to most articles. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Fair point. I've removed the mention of his surname where requested. Cal Umbra 20:39, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Route to the final and the first para of Analysis seem to be pretty similar in coverage, are both needed?
- I have mentioned it briefly in the "Analysis" section only as a comparison of the matches played by both teams. Generally teams have an advantage with home games and both clubs only played one home game each.
"Dunfermline scored a goal when" I don't think "a goal" is necessary, there's only one way to score in this game.
- Removed "a goal".
You hyphenate semi-final but not mishitting. Seems odd to me!
- Does look rather odd now you mention it although with a hyphen it comes up as a spelling mistake! I've added a hyphen anyway.
"which he confirmed later" -> "later confirmed"
- Changed.
A lot of double full stops in the references.
- I believe they are necessary as they are all preceded by "F.C." which is an abbreviation, which should be then followed by a full stop.
  - No, I don't think double full stops are appropriate, per MOS:CONSECUTIVE. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Right enough. I stand corrected. Cal Umbra 20:39, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put it on hold for a week and give it another look over then. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I've seen to the points you've mentioned. Some may require further discussion. Cal Umbra 19:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]