Talk:2006 USC Trojans football team

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force.

University of Southern California (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Southern California, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.University of Southern CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of Southern CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern California articles

Attendence?

Should there be an attendence column as well? The Arkansas game was a record for them (76k+). They feature one in the USC media guide; also...why the coaches poll? The USC guide uses the AP Poll (since before 2003, thank you ;-) ); mainly because it stretches back to 1936. --Bobak 21:54, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think there was some discussion at the college football wikiproject about using the coache's poll because it is part of the BCS formula. Personally, I think the AP poll is better as a single poll because (1) it has the longer history (2) it is independent - voters in the AP poll are not contract bound to vote the winner of the mythical national championship game as their final number one. The consensus at the college football wikiproject seems to now be in favor of the AP poll. I think the main thing is to pick one and be consistent. Johntex\^talk 18:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

This article seriously needs expansion. It is October and the Trojans are number 2 in the nation and this article is effectively still a stub! Let's go Trojans! Johntex\^talk 16:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've begun trying to expand the article. I just put up a very detailed preseason section including lost starters, projected starters, actual starters, coaching changes, preseason awards, preseason rankings, recruiting, and intact streaks. I also linked the players on the roster who have pages and made some minor edits to that. I intend to put up game summaries including changes in the starting lineups and injuries, any records set in those games, and general performance. I intend to put up a section on records (school, Pac-10, and NCAA if there are any) that were set during the year be it a single-play single-game, multiple-game, season, career record that merits mention. (These will be easier in the spring when the Spring Media Guide comes out.) As for awards, I will put up the actual awards that players on this team got both national and conference. Final stats will go up after the Rose Bowl. I have decided to be ambitious and do plan to go back the last couple of years as I have most of the necessary material available to do so. Pat Maher 07:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Working on it

It is nice too see a UT fan helping update a USC page, i have been updating this page as best as i can for a while now, but am also doing a Clemson 2006 page. So all help is appreciated. I am still new in wikipedia, is there any way to fix the game notes so they are not so spread out?

Lots of good additions have been made since I last saw this anemic page. I've added more info, along with some photos I took of a few games. --Bobak 22:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 USC Trojans football team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927162935/http://sportspic.vegasexperts.com/articles.asp?aid=900 to http://sportspic.vegasexperts.com/articles.asp?aid=900

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]