Talk:2005 UEFA Champions League final/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:2005 UEFA Champions League Final/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
The article is quite good but has prose problems and missing some info. So I put the article on hold for seven days. Add the info and get a good copyedit, then I can pass it. Good luck! :)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Many problems here. :( A few examples:
"four-times winners" and "six-times winners"
Change "last year's" to "2004". "Last year" can mean 2008. For same reason, change "next season" to "the following season".
*"The score was 3–2 to Liverpool when Andriy Shevchenko saw his penalty saved by Liverpool goalkeeper Jerzy Dudek, meaning Liverpool won their fifth European Cup, 20 years after being banned from Europe following Heysel." Long sentence, try to split and remove not needed details.
"Third qualifying round"
"in their final"
"with each getting 20,000 tickets each"
"Paolo Maldini, who had won…and Clarence Seedorf who has won"
"doubt over who start as the main"
"with Hernán Crespo being preferred to Filippo Inzaghi, who was not in the match day squad and Jon Dahl Tomasson up front"
"his shot is cleared only for Gerrard to cross in from the right wing, which Sami Hyypia heads towards goal producing a save out of Dida"
I see many commas placed wrong, I think is called comma splice
"approxiamtely", wrong spelling
"on the 8 July" and "on the 10 June"
- Many problems here. :( A few examples:
- A. Prose quality:
- Fixed all this I think NapHit (talk) 16:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- B. MoS compliance:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- If there is one paragraph about qualification, why all the other rounds only in a table?
Last two paragraphs of Summary section, better go to Post match section.
Maybe mention in last paragraph about how Liverpool fare in 2005-06 Champions League
Need to add paragraph about 2007 final rematch.
- If there is one paragraph about qualification, why all the other rounds only in a table?
- A. Major aspects:
- The route to the final doesn't need to talk about every round, just summarise it. The last two sections are fine in the summary, post-match is more about reactions. Next season is not relevant to this article, and only a brief mention is needed on the 2007 final which is done in the lead, there is n need for an extra paragraph. NapHit (talk) 16:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- B. Focused:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is "show-piece event" and "showpiece match" NPOV?
"The early arrivals were lively but generally there was no violence and the mood between the two fans was friendly."
Maybe "most notably" is POV.
- Is "show-piece event" and "showpiece match" NPOV?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Since an editor has requested an second opinon on this article - i have reviewed it inline with GA Critera and can not find anything wrong with it. Also since the comments above seem to off been sorted im passing this article. Well done Jason Rees (talk) 22:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)