Talk:Timeline of the 2003 invasion of Iraq

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 October 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Early comments

New templates

After reading through a couple weeks of events I realized that many recollections seem to be slanted towards one side or the other, some of these I doubt actually have happened. And after scrolling through the entire article, I realized that while there are some citations only one is listed on the bottom-odd, as they have numbers. There are other templates (like grammer and spelling) that can be applied to this article, but in short it just needs some major cleaning up. Nichts 18:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

This article needs some major cleanup. It needs an english language speaker to go over and smooth out some spots where the language is clumsy. Alas, I cannot, 35.11.183.95 02:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just revised the article so that it is consistently in the present tense (in keeping with the style of other Wikipedia timelines). I also did more extensive cleanup in the March 18-20 section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnWRuble (talk • contribs) 16:07, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Page Merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was do not merge into 2003 in Iraq.
Stale merge, AFD occured while merge tag was present without mention of merging. New merge proposal would be benefical. -- DarkCrow^Caw 13:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These two articles; 2003 in Iraq and this article are almost identical and should be merged together. The information is entirely the same and for the same period. Outback the koala (talk) 01:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support - This article covers nothing that shouldn't be covered in Iraq War. AzureFury (talk | contribs) 20:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move instead - The title of this article sounds like it was created with the impression that the invasion of Iraq would constitute the entire war. However, it covers only the timeline of the invasion in detail, instead of the entire year. It should be moved to 2003 invasion of Iraq timeline or something of that sort. The title is misleading, but the two articles aren't really the same. It should have been moved years ago.--Abusing (talk) 02:00, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would rather support a merge with 2003 invasion of Iraq.--Abusing (talk) 02:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the name is not going to help this page. I proposed the merge as an alternative to proposing it's deteltion, as per WP:PROD. If instead it would be more efficient to eliminate this page through deletion, then I should hate to lose any material that could be saved by moving it over to the other article, hence the proposal to merge. Outback the koala (talk) 03:01, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Timeline of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

SaddamStatue.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 1, 2003 - Haditha Dam

April 1, 2003 - Haditha Dam seized by U.S. Army Special Operation forces, mainly 3rd Battalion of 75th Ranger Regiment. 98.97.33.71 (talk) 18:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]