Talk:2002 South Australian state election
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1997 - 2002, 5 years?
[edit]Per http://web.archive.org/web/20040822024427/www.crikey.com.au/politics/2002/02/03-saelectiontips.html what were the "delays due to loopholes"? Timeshift (talk) 10:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- 4 years 4 months in fact. I'm sure the delay was legal, and Crikey observes that Labor didn't complain. If we can find the rules about election dates we should put them in, but calling it "loopholes" is a bit of colourful language by Crikey and I don't think we should put it in. Peter Ballard (talk) 05:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Normally in the Westminster system the time limit is on the life of a parliament not the period between elections. Normally there's a period of some weeks between polling day and the clock starting with the new parliament formally opening. If that parliament runs to the absolute maximum of its life then there's a further period of some weeks before polling day in the next election. Timrollpickering (talk) 13:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- C-Class South Australia articles
- Low-importance South Australia articles
- WikiProject South Australia articles
- C-Class Australian politics articles
- Low-importance Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australia articles