Talk:2002 Scottish Challenge Cup final/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:2002 Scottish Challenge Cup Final/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 18:09, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Comments
- In the lead you have some sentences/paragraphs referenced, some others not. Why? Ordinarily a lead shouldn't contain information that isn't expanded on in the main article (so in general a lead needs no refs at all).
- "second appearance in the final of the tournament since losing" do you mean second appearance or first appearance since losing? Or perhaps "second appearance ... having lost..."?
- " game and scored the first goal in the 33rd minute from John O'Neill" -> "game with John O'Neill scoring the first goal in the 33rd minute".
- Be aware of football jargon like "header"... we have a glossary of terms you could hashlink to specific sections as required.
- The lead you refer to it as using "elimination rounds" but the main article states (and links) it to be a "knock-out" tournament. Would try to be consistent here.
- "28 of the teams " avoid starting sentences with a number.
- "two received random byes into the second round" is this referenced anywhere?
- "produce a shock" is that a quote? To stay neutral I'd ask for a reference or attributable quotation here.
- "The stadium had played host to" -> "The stadium hosted..."
- "Dumfries based" needs a hyphen.
- References should use WP:DASH where appropriate and should avoid SHOUTING too.
- All references now contain "En dash" where appropriate and case has been lowered to sentence case where applicable. Cal Umbra 10:03, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
The Rambling Man (talk) 19:23, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
All-round good stuff, just need to address the above comments, so I'll place the nomination on-hold for a week. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:23, 21 July 2013 (UTC)